From: Michael Roberts (michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 08:01:48 EST
Should racists like Faussette be allowed on this list? I dont think so.
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: Glenn Morton
To: RFaussette@aol.com ; jwburgeson@juno.com ; michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk
Cc: asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: Subject: Re: Four items of possible controversy
-----Original Message-----
From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On Behalf Of RFaussette@aol.com
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:09 PM
If the quote had been changed from 'innate natures' (that is: a nature which is inherent and cannot be modified as in a 'created race' rather than an 'evolved race') to 'current relative natures' (reflecting the evolutionary plasticity of each stock making it capable of freely evolving and changing the relativity of those natures) it would be correct - I disregard the prophecy which could accurately be built on observation, not prescience.
There are racial differences. They have nothing to do with the intrinsic worth of a soul - but they are real evolved differences.
GRM: Having two wonderful daughters-in-law, who would fall under Morris' definiton of 'hamitic' I couldn't disagree more with what you have written. Each individual is unique, there are no 'racial differences' involved in personality. Did I wake up this morning in the 1950's? I won't reply to any defense of the nonsense above.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 09:27:13 EST