RE: Subject: Re: Four items of possible controversy

From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Tue Nov 18 2003 - 06:59:34 EST

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Subject: Re: Four items of possible controversy"

      -----Original Message-----
      From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of RFaussette@aol.com
      Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:09 PM
       If the quote had been changed from 'innate natures' (that is: a nature
    which is inherent and cannot be modified as in a 'created race' rather than
    an 'evolved race') to 'current relative natures' (reflecting the
    evolutionary plasticity of each stock making it capable of freely evolving
    and changing the relativity of those natures) it would be correct - I
    disregard the prophecy which could accurately be built on observation, not
    prescience.
      There are racial differences. They have nothing to do with the intrinsic
    worth of a soul - but they are real evolved differences.

      GRM: Having two wonderful daughters-in-law, who would fall under Morris'
    definiton of 'hamitic' I couldn't disagree more with what you have written.
    Each individual is unique, there are no 'racial differences' involved in
    personality. Did I wake up this morning in the 1950's? I won't reply to
    any defense of the nonsense above.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Nov 18 2003 - 07:03:14 EST