From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Nov 12 2003 - 22:22:06 EST
In a message dated 11/12/03 10:02:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
bnelson301@yahoo.com writes:
I presumed
the Burgy was not championing a particular ideological
position with his illustration but was concerned about
such use of money generally. Burgy can certainly
speak for himself on that matter and chose to assume
that it was not ideologically motivated. I don't know
why my assumption of his good character was apparently
offensive to you.
This is what you wrote;
It happens on both sides of the political aisle as Burgy's illustration
points out.
Burgy's illustration didn't point out that it happens on both sides of the
political aisle. I didn't take umbrage. I am not interested in Burgy's
character. I just corrected you because my entire reason for posting was to provide a
counter point to Burgy's remark to provide the "second side" that Burgy did
not provide. Other religionists in other religions don't care much about the
leverage they exert in the world. What is the concern among Christians, is it
that Christians may exert too much leverage? I'm raising the question after
Burgy suggested in some cases it is immoral. In what cases?
rich faussette
rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 12 2003 - 22:22:53 EST