re:fine tuning

From: Debbie Mann (deborahjmann@insightbb.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:43:55 EDT

  • Next message: Josh Bembenek: "Re: Benjamin Wiker on ID (fwd)..Fine Tuning"

    BlankSomeone fill me in on the rules to replying on this system. Or the
    rules in general.

    To: Howard

    I disagree with your interpretation on biology. The contention is that
    leaving the development of life to an untuned or random system means that
    the conditions just don't add up. In other words God WOULD have to tune the
    conditions in order for life to have developed as it did within the
    calculated age of the universe. I believe this is a successful argument on
    the part of ID, just using indirect methods instead of direct. "Proving by
    contradiction."
     By the way, Robert Shapiro declares himself to be a Skeptic. He does not
    profess Christianity, or even belief in God in his books. He simply finds
    fault with everybody else's work. I guess that, according to him, none of us
    can exist.

    Debbie Mann, PE
    Debbie Mann Consulting
    (765)477-1776


    Blank_Bkgrd.gif

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Apr 11 2003 - 13:41:00 EDT