RE: Woodmarappe attacks Morton

From: Glenn Morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Sun Apr 06 2003 - 03:17:21 EDT

Next message: Glenn Morton: "Woodmorappe's new article"

Previous message: John Burgeson: "Re: ID science (subtopic 4)"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Roberts: "Woodmarappe attacks Morton"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks for the heads up on Woody, Michael. We can agree on Woody's use of
those dates. Woodmorappe specifically searched through the literature
excluding any good dates and collected all dates which were out by 20% from
the expectation. Then he illogically concludes that radiometric dating
doesn't work

I will put something on my web site today.

Next message: Glenn Morton: "Woodmorappe's new article"
Previous message: John Burgeson: "Re: ID science (subtopic 4)"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Roberts: "Woodmarappe attacks Morton"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 07 2003 - 22:51:47 EDT