Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)

• Previous message: Dick Fischer: "RE: Gen 1:1 and Concordism"
• In reply to: Michael Roberts: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Next in thread: D. F. Siemens, Jr.: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

        It's worth noting that both Luke 9:50 and 11:23 are in the same
Gospel.

Shalom,

George

Michael Roberts wrote:

> I prefer " How to play intellectual ping-pong" In every argument it is
> either PING or PONG and never PING-PONG.
>
> This is not my original but comes from an essay by Basil Mitchell "How to
> play theoloigcal ping-pong" so we always take the two extremes and say
> choose one
>
> Creation/Evolution
> Jesus of History / Risen Lord
>
> Lots more examples from every sphere of society.
>
> Michael
>
> > Perhaps one character trait of any form of fundamentalism (religious,
> > political, racial, etc.) is its binary logic: You're either "us" or
> "them."
> > Given that approach, the tribal "God" is presumed to be of the same
> "mind."
> >
> > Howard Van Till
> >
> >

• Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Previous message: Dick Fischer: "RE: Gen 1:1 and Concordism"
• In reply to: Michael Roberts: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Next in thread: D. F. Siemens, Jr.: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 19:39:13 EST