Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)

From: Michael Roberts (topper@robertschirk.u-net.com)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 16:41:20 EST

  • Next message: D. F. Siemens, Jr.: "Re: Genesis One and Concordism (was a lot of other things previously)"

    I prefer " How to play intellectual ping-pong" In every argument it is
    either PING or PONG and never PING-PONG.

    This is not my original but comes from an essay by Basil Mitchell "How to
    play theoloigcal ping-pong" so we always take the two extremes and say
    choose one

    Creation/Evolution
    Jesus of History / Risen Lord

    Lots more examples from every sphere of society.

    Michael

    > Perhaps one character trait of any form of fundamentalism (religious,
    > political, racial, etc.) is its binary logic: You're either "us" or
    "them."
    > Given that approach, the tribal "God" is presumed to be of the same
    "mind."
    >
    > Howard Van Till
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 17:12:20 EST