> > Moorad writes:
>
> You can use the word evolution in everything you say and do. The challenge
> is to relate the evolutionary theorIES to the practical sciences and I am
> sure that there is none! Moorad
>
I start these observations by saying that I am sorry the ID people
have either left the list or are content to let Moorad do the heavy
lifting for their position. He is at the moment boldly taking on all
comers without much encouragement from his peers.
Having said that I would like to assert that, in my opinion, two
important underlying convictions are not on the table in Moorad's
discussion (and in ID discussions), and just as discussions from all
levels from individuals (e.g. in marriage) to countries are hindered
when the all the real issues are not on the table this hinders our
discussion.
My impression is that the lens through which Moorad and ID view the world
of evolutionary biology consists of two foundational convictions.
1. The theological conviction that evolution is incompatible with
Christianity (in particular with the idea that humans are created
in the image of God).
2. An accompanying conviction that evolutionary theory must be
deprived of any association with the word "science" because
science is equated with truth in our culture (and evolution is not
true).
These convictions do not imply that Moorad and the intelligent design
people are necessarily wrong, but it does strongly suggest that
physical evidence is secondary, and that the discussion needs to be
broadened to include the real issues. Can we support or discount these
convictions theologically?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel W. Cannon | (724)223-6146
Physics Department |
Washington and Jefferson College |
Washington, PA 15301 |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 12 2001 - 12:31:45 EDT