Re: Evolution and the Image of god

From: Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@uncwil.edu)
Date: Mon Oct 01 2001 - 15:29:48 EDT

  • Next message: george murphy: "Re: Evolution and the Image of god"

    I do make a distinction between experimental science and historical
    sciences. I agree how God sustains the universe is rather hard to fathom.
    In the beginning God's hands were shaking when He created, origin of
    Planck's constant and quantum mechanics :) but now it is so steady that it
    is imperceptible. Moorad

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "bivalve" <bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com>
    To: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:45 PM
    Subject: Re: Evolution and the Image of god

    > >> I am referring to a "complete theory of the origin of man." I for one
    believe that the origin question is not a scientific question so I agree
    with you that there is no complete theory of the origin of man. But
    certainly there is, almost, a complete theory of superconductivity. <<
    >
    > Unless the theory of superconductivity precisely explains how God sustains
    the process, uses it to bring about His will, etc. then it is no more
    complete than a theory of the origin of man that only deals with the
    physical processes used to create our bodies.
    >
    > Dr. David Campbell
    > "Old Seashells"
    > 46860 Hilton Dr #1113
    > Lexington Park MD 20653 USA
    > bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com
    >
    > "That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted
    Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks"-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at
    Droigate Spa
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ________________________________________________________________
    > Sent via the WebMail system at mail.davidson.alumlink.com
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 15:29:48 EDT