I do make a distinction between experimental science and historical
sciences. I agree how God sustains the universe is rather hard to fathom.
In the beginning God's hands were shaking when He created, origin of
Planck's constant and quantum mechanics :) but now it is so steady that it
is imperceptible. Moorad
----- Original Message -----
From: "bivalve" <bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Evolution and the Image of god
> >> I am referring to a "complete theory of the origin of man." I for one
believe that the origin question is not a scientific question so I agree
with you that there is no complete theory of the origin of man. But
certainly there is, almost, a complete theory of superconductivity. <<
>
> Unless the theory of superconductivity precisely explains how God sustains
the process, uses it to bring about His will, etc. then it is no more
complete than a theory of the origin of man that only deals with the
physical processes used to create our bodies.
>
> Dr. David Campbell
> "Old Seashells"
> 46860 Hilton Dr #1113
> Lexington Park MD 20653 USA
> bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com
>
> "That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted
Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks"-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at
Droigate Spa
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Sent via the WebMail system at mail.davidson.alumlink.com
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 01 2001 - 15:29:48 EDT