From: bivalve <bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com>
> One of my Czech relatives claimed that the Grand Canyon was the result of
a Czech pioneer seeking to retrieve a nickel he had dropped down a gopher
hole. Without any evidence that the processes required by either model
could have sufficient effect in the necessary time, I am sceptical of both.
The model that you suggest does have the advantage of not trying to produce
the canyon during the Flood, in contrast to other YEC claims that I have
encountered.
I've heard that it was a Scotsman. :)
I believe that the model I present is the most popular Flood Catastrophist
model at this time. (I didn't invent it).
Allen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 12 2001 - 17:32:14 EDT