Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@novagate.com)
Date: Wed Aug 29 2001 - 11:18:01 EDT

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Homosexuality"

Previous message: pruest@pop.dplanet.ch: "Inerrancy (was: Why YEC?)"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Next in thread: Adrian Teo: "RE: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mr. Blanchet,

By your use of phrases like 'humanistic path,' and 'outwardly appearance,'
and 'another Gospel' you have made your disdain of the Roman Catholic Church
abundantly clear. I see no need for continuing this particular discussion.

Howard Van Till

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Homosexuality"
Previous message: pruest@pop.dplanet.ch: "Inerrancy (was: Why YEC?)"
Maybe in reply to: John W Burgeson: "Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Next in thread: Adrian Teo: "RE: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 29 2001 - 11:26:42 EDT