Jeffrey Greenberg commented:
> Michael Roberts attracts our attention to the space given
> environmental issues and environmental ethics by Campus
> Crusade's Leadership University. Please note that LU seems to be
> in a rather confused state of opinion over the complexity of
> environmental science, politics, theology, economics and their
> interrelationships. Most of CC's or LU's chosen opinion articles are
> clearly "free market" anti-regulatory and very conservative (I hate to
> use that modifier) relative to politics and theology. Most attitudes
> expressed are not so much for care of Creation but for "liberal" use
> of all its attributes. Cal DeWitt thrown into the mix is an odd
> bedfellow because he really represents a much more truly
> conservative position counter to our selfish exploitation of global
> resources.
>
The one thing that seems most absent in their (LU) examples
is the scientific consensus. Please see
Nature 412, 112 - 114 (12 July 2001)
The National Academy of Science is likely to have its
own inherent problems and agendas. However, when they
agree there is a problem, I suspect there probably is.
by Grace we proceed,
Wayne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 23:36:55 EDT