Vernon wrote: "I observe you have what would appear to be a boundless
tolerance to coincidence. "
Hardly "boundless," my friend.
Skeptical? Yes.
If there were fewer "ad hocs" in the coincidences presented, there would
be more reason to consider them seriously. As they are presented,
however, they have insufficient credibility to warrent any study.
John Burgeson (Burgy)
http://www.burgy.50megs.com
(science/theology, quantum mechanics, baseball, ethics,
humor, cars, God's intervention into natural causation, etc.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 06 2001 - 11:35:59 EDT