The big problem comes in the 3rd paragraph. You write:
"As explained in Ref. 1, a key logical principle typically used in science
is proof by elimination, "PE". According to PE, if there is a theory that
describes a certain real event and all other possible natural hypothesis for
explaining that certain event are false except for one specific natural
hypothesis, then this one non-false natural hypothesis is the correct
theory. "
I have been in science for 30 years or so and have never heard of such a
method. The problem is that if all known theories save one has been
falsified, this is no guarentee that the remaining is correct. It also might
be wrong and the case may fall into one of several possibilities:
1. no one has thought of the correct theory.
Aristotelian mechanics was falsified by Galileo, but his theory (not
falsified) wasn't quite correct either. Newton came along and fixed it, but
his wasn't quite correct either so Einstein corrected that. To date, there
is little reason to correct Einstein, but that doesn't mean that in the
future we won't see a need.
2. People reject the wrong theory for inadequate reasons. Continental drift
is an example of this. Wegner, Du Toit and others argued long and hard that
the continents had been connected and then moved apart. In the 20's the AAPG
held a conference in which they questioned everything about drift including
Wegener's parentage. They rejected it based upon the notion that there was
no mechanism which could account for the continental motion. They were
wrong. In the 1960s evidence was found which resurrected the theory and
provided a new mechanism Thus their falsification of drift was false.
3. The mathematics for the development of the theory may not have been
invented yet.
General relativity could not be invented until Riemannian algegra was
invented in the 1800s. If anyone had suggested General Relativity to a
friend in 1750, it would have been rejected as the creation of a mad man.
4. Our minds very well might not be able to comprehend the true theory.
This is becoming a worry among physicists trying to develop a theory of
everything. When we begin to work with math of 10-11 dimensions and attempt
to deal with non-linearities in those dimensions, we may never truly
understand the full implications of what we have wrought.
5. One can never rule out that invisible leprechauns actually cause
everything to happen in the universe. Thus by your methodology, this
becomes the correct theory because one can find difficulties with every
other theory of man. But this one can't be so falsified and must therefore
be true.
glenn
see http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
for lots of creation/evolution information
anthropology/geology/paleontology/theology\
personal stories of struggle
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 26 2000 - 11:02:35 EST