Re: Glenn's assertion

From: Bill Payne (bpayne15@juno.com)
Date: Sat Nov 04 2000 - 21:49:23 EST

Next message: Inge Frette: "new book by Michael Ruse"

Previous message: george murphy: "Re: Adam never met Eve"
Maybe in reply to: John Burgeson: "Glenn's assertion"
Next in thread: John Burgeson: "Re: Glenn's assertion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:41:08 -0500 John Burgeson <burgy@compuserve.com>
writes:
>
> I noticed this week while reading Acts that Stephen, before being
> stoned by the people, reviewed the OT history for them. He started
> with Abraham, not with Adam.

But in chapter 3, Luke works his way back to Adam, the son of God.

Bill

Next message: Inge Frette: "new book by Michael Ruse"
Previous message: george murphy: "Re: Adam never met Eve"
Maybe in reply to: John Burgeson: "Glenn's assertion"
Next in thread: John Burgeson: "Re: Glenn's assertion"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 05 2000 - 23:42:21 EST