Re: Best of YEC

From: Adam Crowl (qraal@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 23 2000 - 03:47:54 EST

  • Next message: glenn morton: "Re: Best of YEC"

    Hi ASA

    Glenn if Lubenow is their best defense then there's not a lot going for the
    rest of them. He makes so many mistakes and misunderstands evolutionary
    theory almost utterly. And his other palaeontological works aren't much
    better...

    Adam

    >From: glenn morton <mortongr@flash.net>
    >To: James Mahaffy <mahaffy@mtcnet.net>
    >CC: asa@calvin.edu
    >Subject: Re: Best of YEC
    >Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:15:48 +0000
    >
    >At 09:11 AM 2/22/00 -0600, James Mahaffy wrote:
    > >Folks,
    > >
    > >I would be interested in feedback on what are some of the best titles
    > >from the YEC camp. Gish I assume is always fairly good at least in his
    > >chemistry. I am aware that Austin wrote a little book on the Grand
    > >Canyon. Are these two considered the best defenders of the movement?
    > >My initial impression of Ken H. is that he is a bit weak on his science.
    > >
    > >I am not YEC but am intereste in knowing what books make their best
    > >defense.
    >
    >I think the best defense of YEC is Martin Lubenow's Bones of Contention.
    >Austin gets the geology wrong in the Grand Canyon and Gish simply messes up
    >paleontology and other topics.
    > >
    > >--
    > >James and Florence Mahaffy 712 722-0381 (Home)
    > >227 S. Main St. 712 722-6279 (Office)
    > >Sioux Center, IA 51250
    > >
    > >
    >glenn
    >
    >Foundation, Fall and Flood
    >Adam, Apes and Anthropology
    >http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
    >
    >Lots of information on creation/evolution

    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 03:48:28 EST