Hi ASA
Glenn if Lubenow is their best defense then there's not a lot going for the
rest of them. He makes so many mistakes and misunderstands evolutionary
theory almost utterly. And his other palaeontological works aren't much
better...
Adam
>From: glenn morton <mortongr@flash.net>
>To: James Mahaffy <mahaffy@mtcnet.net>
>CC: asa@calvin.edu
>Subject: Re: Best of YEC
>Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:15:48 +0000
>
>At 09:11 AM 2/22/00 -0600, James Mahaffy wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >I would be interested in feedback on what are some of the best titles
> >from the YEC camp. Gish I assume is always fairly good at least in his
> >chemistry. I am aware that Austin wrote a little book on the Grand
> >Canyon. Are these two considered the best defenders of the movement?
> >My initial impression of Ken H. is that he is a bit weak on his science.
> >
> >I am not YEC but am intereste in knowing what books make their best
> >defense.
>
>I think the best defense of YEC is Martin Lubenow's Bones of Contention.
>Austin gets the geology wrong in the Grand Canyon and Gish simply messes up
>paleontology and other topics.
> >
> >--
> >James and Florence Mahaffy 712 722-0381 (Home)
> >227 S. Main St. 712 722-6279 (Office)
> >Sioux Center, IA 51250
> >
> >
>glenn
>
>Foundation, Fall and Flood
>Adam, Apes and Anthropology
>http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
>
>Lots of information on creation/evolution
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 23 2000 - 03:48:28 EST