Re: Physical constants

From: James W Stark (stark2301@voyager.net)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 10:27:24 EST

  • Next message: Kamilla Ludwig: "Re: Physical constants"

    > From: Massie <mrlab@ix.netcom.com>
    > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:14:28 -0500
    > To: asa@calvin.edu
    > Subject: Physical constants
    >
    >
    > Let me encourge you to believe that the scinetific community which most
    > assuredly does not believe that the speed of light is changing is not
    > taking this position for any phisophical or theological agenda.
    > Further, the question has been and is continuing to be re-asked because
    > showing it to be wrong immediately gets a big Nobel prize.
    >
    > Bert M.
    Speak for yourself Bert. The whole community of scientists does not insist
    that the speed of light is a constant over time. Some are bold enough to
    challenge the status quo. For starters read John D. Barrow's article in New
    Scientist, 24 July 1999 at

    http://www.newscientist.com/ns/19990724/isnothings.html

    Then read Speed of Light Slowing Down by Chuck Missler at

    http://ldolphin.org/speedo.html

    Personally, I take an agnostic but open position. The status quo needs to
    change. It is too set in its dogmatic claims. This is a problem in science
    as well as religion.
    Jim Stark



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 12 2000 - 10:28:37 EST