Re: concordism/time

From: Dick Fischer (dfischer@mnsinc.com)
Date: Mon Jan 10 2000 - 22:49:34 EST

  • Next message: Massie: "Re: concordism/time"

    Jim Stark wrote:

    >Could someone explain the logic of interpretation that asserts time was
    >created? "In the beginning" implies the beginning position of a sequence of
    >events in time. It does not appear to assert that the position has to be
    >zero for time. What was created was space and matter.

    Current Big Bang theory asserts that tme, space, matter and energy all
    commenced at the singularity. None of the four entities can exist prior to
    the Big Bang event. Time is motion dependent.

    Dick Fischer - The Origins Solution - www.orisol.com
    "The answer we should have known about 150 years ago."



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 10 2000 - 22:46:40 EST