Maybe I'm missing something. Could someone tell me how one would even begin
to use an astronomical model to make this type of a claim?
George Parks
gdp@ppco.com or
gdparks@galstar.com
Maybe I'mAt 10:32 AM 3/6/96 -0800, you wrote:
>On Wed, 6 Mar 1996 HVANTILL@legacy.Calvin.EDU wrote:
>> This story has all of the characteristics of mischievous fabrication. And
>> when mischievously fabricated fables are presented as truth in the name of
>> Christian belief, the real Gospel gets another black eye.
>>
>> In 1970 we asked for documentation of the claims made in this particular
>> fable. In response we were told stories of the sort, "The documentation has
>> been lost. The computer program has been destroyed. ...etc."
>
>The person who posted the Spencer account found a couple of WEB references.
>
>http://bbs.cresnet.org/library/bstudy/bs/bibl22.txt
>
>This has the Spencer account as well as some followup from the
>Minneapolis Star. That quotes Hill as saying:
> . Since this event came to my attention about two years ago, I have
> misplaced the source information. I can only say that had I not
> considered the source to be completely reliable, I would not have used
> it in the first place. I am interested in facts, not fiction.
>
>http://tommy.jsc.nasa.gov/~woodfill/SPACEED/SEHHTML/still.html
>
>This one uses the 'missing day' as a springboard for an educational
>exercise, with study questions (how could it happen? would the sun
>standing still be the only noticible effect? etc).
>
>
>
>
***************************|*******************************
* George D. Parks | office: (918) 661-7780 *
* 356 PL PRC | home: (918) 336-3041 *
* Phillips Petroleum | FAX: (918) 662-1097 *
* Bartlesville, OK 74004 | email: gdp@ppco.com *
* | or: gdparks@galstar.com *
***********************************************************