gaps?

Bill Dozier (dozier@radix.net)
Wed, 6 Mar 1996 15:05:11 -0500

>> Far too many people seem to believe that there *must*, at the end of the
>> game, remain *some* part of the Creation process that we will *never* be
>> able to explain. At its basis, this is "God of the gaps" thinking.
>
>Isn't it true that far too many people seem to believe that eventually
>*all* phenomena are suseptible to naturalistic explanation? At its basis,
>this is "Science of the gaps" thinking.
>

True enough. However, it is not necessary to choose between only these
positions.