Accurate Understanding
and Respectful Attitudes
Students in my high school learned
valuable lessons about understanding and attitudes from one of our favorite
teachers,
who sometimes held debates in his civics class. On Monday he convinced
us that “his side of the issue” was correct, but on Tuesday he
made the other side look just as good. After awhile we learned that,
in order to get accurate understanding, we
should get the best information and arguments that all sides of an issue
can claim as support. After we did this, so we understood more accurately
and thoroughly, we usually recognized that even when we have valid reasons
to prefer one position, people on other sides of an issue may also
have good reasons, both intellectual and ethical, for believing as they
do, so we learned respectful attitudes.
But respect does not require
agreement. You can respect someone and their views, yet criticize
their views, which you have evaluated based on evidence,
logic, and values. The
intention of our teacher, and the conclusion of his students, was
not a postmodern
relativism. The goal was a rational exploration and evaluation of ideas
in a search for truth, for true principles (corresponding to reality) that are a useful foundation for thoughts-and-actions because, when combined with good values, they lead to wise-and-effective strategies, policies, and decisions.
In this website, we want
to encourage accurate understanding and respectful attitudes by avoiding “Monday
without Tuesday” indoctrination, by accurately and respectfully describing
the main views on each topic. Of course, individual web-pages and the overall website will not be perceived by everyone as being NEUTRAL, due to a mixture of
reality (because it really is impossible to say anything substantial in a way
that
is totally
neutral) and/or perception (because many people
prefer
a treatment that is biased in favor of their own views, and they consider
a treatment to be “neutral” only if it's biased in this way). But we
will try to be FAIR by treating different perspectives with respect, and
by providing an opportunity for representatives of each
perspective
to clearly
express
their own views and criticize other views.
Even though there won't be total
agreement about everything by everyone, we can make the process of agreeing
(about
many things) and
disagreeing
(about
a few things) more enjoyable and productive. We want to use productive
communication — in
an effort to achieve understanding and mutual respect — in
our search for truth.
A search for truth? Yes. This
is not a postmodern website. We are dedicated to the rationality
of logic and faith, and the compatibility of logic and faith.
AN APPENDIX, regarding opportunities for understanding-and-respect in one part of the website: An interesting educational application, which illustrates principles that also apply in other areas where a “multiple perspectives” approach can be useful for improving understanding and respect, is the hotly debated area of Questions about Origins where you'll find "intellectual drama in the conflict of ideas." A page about Understanding and Respect in our Search for Truth about Origins contains the ideas above, and more, including this excerpt: ... Consistent with our Christian
beliefs, we want to encourage a more consistent use of productive communication — in an effort
to improve understanding and mutual respect — as an essential part of
our individual and collective searches for truth, in what we write and say, during all of our personal interactions. |
This page, written by Craig Rusbult, is
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/ua.htm
HomePage for
Whole-Person Science Education