Re: Question about "Redesigning Science"

• Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: macroevolution or macromutations?"
• Maybe in reply to: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Question about "Redesigning Science""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>This means that the test for CSI is the same as the test for design as
>defined in his earlier book "The Design Inference", namely:
>
> P(E) < 1/2 X 10^150
>
>But no-one to my knowledge has ever succeeded in showing that the
>probability of a specified event in nature is this small.

All such evidences boil down to a mis-use of probability. Probably only
applies to future events, never historical events.

billwald@juno.com

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

• Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Dembski's universal small probability bound"
• Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: macroevolution or macromutations?"
• Maybe in reply to: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Question about "Redesigning Science""
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 19 2000 - 01:31:49 EDT