Re: ID

From: Cliff Lundberg (cliff@cab.com)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 02:27:20 EDT

Next message: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"

Previous message: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: Building the bridge between science, theology"
In reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>What we have in common is skepticism of "random mutation and
>natural selection" as an explanation of nature's diversity.

I have no problem with RM&NS. I do have a problem with complexes
arising solely through microevolution. I guess this makes me a special
enemy of ID, since ID theorists rely heavily on the straw man of
microevolution. (Evolution must be gradual, so it can be false!)

--Cliff Lundberg  ~  San Francisco  ~  415-648-0208  ~  cliff@cab.com

Next message: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Previous message: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: Building the bridge between science, theology"
In reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 30 2000 - 04:08:19 EDT