ID

From: Bertvan@aol.com
Date: Sun May 28 2000 - 09:19:24 EDT

Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Suspicions aroused..."

Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: Building the bridge between science, theology"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Richard:
>You didn't answer my question. Which science lessons would you replace with
>debates? Or would you teach the same science as at present, and just add
>some extra time for debates?

Bertvan:
Hi Richaard. The Kansas school board, and every ID I've heard of, favor
teaching children orthodox Darwinism. It is the accepted theory in the world
today, and of course children should know it. They merely suggest children
should also be aware that some scientists hold dissenting views.
Bertvan.

Next message: Wesley R. Elsberry: "Suspicions aroused..."
Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: Building the bridge between science, theology"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "ID"
Next in thread: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Stephen E. Jones: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Maybe reply: Richard Wein: "Re: ID"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 28 2000 - 09:19:35 EDT