>BW>You have decided
>>to reject evidence against design before analyzing it.
>Again, no. I am well aware of the evidence against design (I have after
>all been a member of this Reflector for 5 years!), but I consider that
the
>evidence for design is far stronger than the evidence against it.
I Apoligize, I read something between the lines which wasn't there.
>So presumably Bill himself must accept that there is evidence for design
at *some* level?
Either design or multiple universes and this is the one which turned out
ok.
I don't necessarially believe everything I write. I try to make a logical
response to what I read.
I've been on several lists for several years and I don't recall anyone
being "converted" from one position to another. There isn't any point to
going round and round.
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 08 2000 - 10:37:51 EDT