Re: Mike says it's OK to misrepresent people (was DisbelievingDarwin...)

From: Huxter4441@aol.com
Date: Wed Mar 22 2000 - 17:04:38 EST

Next message: Susan Brassfield: "the AIDS thing again"

Previous message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 3/21/00 9:27:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tich@primex.co.uk writes:

<< You [Mike Gene]snipped and ignored my argument, choosing only to
respond to my final paragraph. >>

Seems to do that a lot - of course, ignoring much and focusing on little
allows him to focus an argument into an area that he feels more confident in.
Good debate tactics, I suppose, but when it is so transparent, it leads
folks to certain conclusions...

Next message: Susan Brassfield: "the AIDS thing again"
Previous message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Dennett's bad word and Johnson's question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 22 2000 - 17:05:20 EST