Re: Kansas Board of Education's science standards continue to draw controversy, etc

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Mon Mar 20 2000 - 07:58:51 EST

  • Next message: cashprofit3@address.com: "Hello.......It's Done"

    Reflectorites

    Below are web article extracts for the period 7 - 15 March, with my comments in
    square brackets.

    I have added some gene therapy extracts at the end without comment.

    Steve

    ==========================================================
    http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/local.pat,local/37744fa1.314,.html The Kansas
    City Star ... Kansas Board of Education's science standards continue to draw
    controversy By KATE BEEM The Kansas City Star Date: 03/14/00 ... TOPEKA -
    - Almost a year after they first came before the Kansas Board of Education, the
    state's new science standards are still a hot-button topic. Five of the eight speakers
    in the open forum of the board's meeting Tuesday addressed the standards, which
    the board approved in August on a 6-4 vote. Four of those who spoke criticized
    the standards, which the state's testing program will be based on. ... But even as
    the board met, work was progressing at the University of Kansas on new science
    tests based upon the standards, which de-emphasize evolution and leave out
    references to the big-bang theory and the age of the Earth. ... New science and
    social studies tests will be given to students in spring 2001. That does not leave
    much time to write the test, review the questions and field-test the exam in
    classrooms in the fall. The KU center will ask teachers from a random sample of
    Kansas schools to help the center write the test questions. ... Students in the
    fourth, the seventh and the 10th grades will take the science exams. ... about 30
    teachers [were needed] to write questions and 30 to review them. Some critics of
    the standards have said that few Kansas science teachers will agree to be involved
    .... [It's still false to say the new standards "de-emphasize evolution". The new
    standards have a *lot* more about evolution than the old standards. That Darwinists
    continually misrepresent this simple point, despite it being pointed out to them many
    times that it is simply false, makes me cautious in accepting *anything* they say
    unless I can check it for myself.]

    http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=199 "An overwhelming number
    of Americans believe creationism should be taught equally in public schools along
    with evolution." - Zogby American Values Poll Released: March 09, 2000 New
    Zogby "American Values Polls" reveals: Creationism & evolution should be taught
    equally ... An overwhelming number of Americans believe creationism should be
    taught equally in public schools along with evolution, a new Zogby's "American
    Values Poll" reveals. The February survey of 1,028 adults throughout the nation
    showed that 63.7% of those surveyed agreed that creationism needs to be part of
    the regular public school curriculum, including 38.9% who strongly agreed. The
    survey showed that just three in 710 of the respondents (32.2%) disagreed with the
    notion of creationism being taught in public schools. Zogby's "American Values"
    Polls are conducted quarterly to probe more deeply into what values Americans
    hold and what values will ultimately influence their behavior. This is the second
    poll in a continuing series. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3.2%. ... [Despite
    an overwhelming educational, legal and media advantage, Darwinists have failed in
    their 75-year attempt to convince the U.S. public that life originated
    and developed without a Creator. It will be interesting if the new U.S. President will give
    effect to what opinion polls consistently reveal the majority want. At the very least
    the problems and philosophical assumptions of Darwinism should be taught.]

    http://www.space.com/opinion/gonzalez_000229.html ... Mar 14, 2000 space.com
    ... Alien Intelligence? Think Again By Guillermo Gonzalez .... Rare Earth
    Punctures Alien Assumptions ... Opinions. For too long, the astronomy
    establishment has spouted propaganda about extraterrestrial intelligence, writes
    astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez. But now, a real debate has begun. ... The
    existence of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) has been debated since the ancient
    Greeks. Views have never been unanimous, and the center of opinion has
    periodically shifted between positive and negative. Over the last few decades, both
    intellectual and public opinion have been decisively in the pro-ETI camp.
    Unfortunately, the debate has taken place on a very slanted playing field, at least in
    the United States. Among astronomers, the pro-ETI forces have gained the power
    to effectively squash dissenting opinion in recent years. This power is exemplified
    by the "gatekeepers" at popular and even some refereed science journals, and by
    the successful public relations of the SETI institute (see, for example, the movie
    Contact). While I was a "believer" in ETI most of my life, I changed my mind
    about 10 years ago, after I thought carefully about the astronomical and
    geophysical requirements for advanced life in the universe. I found that ETI
    proponents were ignoring basic constraints such as high levels of radiation in many
    regions of the universe. These proponents use the Drake Equation (invented by
    astronomer Frank Drake) to estimate the number of civilizations in the galaxy. But
    the equation is laden with optimistic assumptions and virtually useless. ... Perhaps
    the single most influential criticism of the pro-ETI position in the U.S. was just
    published in book form -- Rare Earth. It is by two of my colleagues at the
    University of Washington, Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee; we met often during
    the last couple of years while the book was being put together to discuss
    astronomical constraints on advanced life. The book's thesis is that advanced life
    may be extremely rare due to: 1) the many potential hazards in the universe and 2)
    the stringent requirements for its existence. The book's growing success shows
    that a significant fraction of the public wants a real debate on the subject, not one-
    sided propaganda from the astronomy establishment. ... [This shift from believing
    that life was abundant and intelligent life plentiful in the universe, to believing that
    life may be rare and intelligent life outside of Earth non-existent, is remarkable. If
    life and intelligent life were plentiful it would be regarded as a confirmation of
    materialism and a problem for Intelligent Design and particularly Christianity.
    Since aliens have taken the place of God in public mythology, if the idea starts to
    sink in that we really might be alone it may have almost as profound an effect as a
    discovery by SETI that we weren't!]

    http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/science/health/031400hth-behavior-evolution.html
    The New York Times March 14, 2000 Human Nature: Born or Made? ... By
    ERICA GOODE When two scientists proposed in a recent book that rape was best
    viewed as a sexual act with its roots in evolution, it set off a squall of protest from
    feminists and social scientists... Even last week the controversy continued, with the
    book's authors engaging in a rancorous exchange over a critical review in the
    scientific journal Nature. But the case put forward by Dr. Randy Thornhill and Dr.
    Craig Palmer in "A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual
    Coercion," ...was not, as some assumed, a fringe theory developed by a pair of
    renegade researchers. Rather, the arguments made by Dr. Thornhill and Dr. Palmer
    fit into a larger theoretical framework, the work of a group of scientists who have
    ushered Darwin into new and provocative areas, including sexual attraction
    between men and women, parenting, jealousy and violence. ... The genes for these
    complex mental mechanisms, the argument goes, were passed on through the
    generations because they adaptive, enhancing survival or reproductive success, and
    eventually, they spread widely and became standard equipment. But in the year
    2000, such mechanisms may or may not be adaptive, and may or may not represent
    aspects of behavior that society wants to encourage. ...even if rape was adaptive in
    the distant past, a notion even many of Dr. Thornhill and Dr. Palmer's like-minded
    colleagues think dubious, that would not mean that it is excusable or should not be
    heavily punished. .. Evolutionary psychologists have not always carried on their
    campaign quietly. They have issued a noisy assault on the way the social sciences
    have done business for the last 50 years, asserting that social scientists have a
    collective phobia about possible biological influences on behavior and an obsession
    with more "politically correct" environmental explanations. Some researchers have
    thrust their work into the spotlight by pursuing topics that seem guaranteed to
    push people's emotional buttons, rape being only the latest example. In the
    process, the scientists have gained a reputation for a self-confidence bordering on
    arrogance ... biology, applied to human behavior, also has a disturbing history of
    misuse. .."social Darwinism," a 19th-century theory that borrowed catch words of
    evolutionary thinking and twisted them into a justification for class differences: the
    struggle for wealth and power, social Darwinists argued, was a battle for "survival
    of the fittest," ... Darwin's theory, stretched and distorted in various ways, was also
    called upon by the Nazis as a rationale for genocide, and has been a staple of
    forced sterilization campaigns and racist propaganda. ... Dr. Stephen Jay Gould...in
    particular, has continued to find fault with the work of scientists, including
    evolutionary psychologists, who seek to explain traits as "adaptations." In fact, he
    argues, many traits are not the products of natural selection, favored because they
    enhance reproduction or survival, but are simply random byproducts of other
    evolutionary developments. ... Some evolutionary biologists have also historically
    opposed applying Darwinian principles to humans...because they think the task is
    simply too complicated....to tease out the legacy of evolution from the effects of
    thousands of years of human culture presents almost insurmountable obstacles,
    particularly given the limits on the kinds of experiments that can be done with
    people.... Still, some evolutionary psychologists feel their arguments for biology
    must overcome substantial resistance. "There is a flagrant double standard that's
    applied to the evidence," said Dr. Buss, whose latest book, "The Dangerous
    Passion" (Free Press, 2000) deals with jealousy, and who has recently proposed
    that human beings may have a specialized mental module for murder. "If it's an
    evolutionary hypothesis, you have to document mountains of evidence before
    anyone will take it seriously, and even then it will be dismissed," Dr. Buss said....
    [More on this "A Natural History of Rape" debate. Thornhill and Palmer seem to
    want to have it both ways, claiming that rape is built-into our selfish genes, yet
    "that would not mean that it is excusable or should not be heavily punished". Buss'
    claim about there being a "specialized mental module for murder" maybe the
    reductio ad absurdum of this genre. The great thing about this debate is that the
    general public will start to realise some of the less palatable aspects of Darwinist
    thinking. Even if other Darwinists oppose evolutionary psychology, the public may
    at least realise how arbitrary are Darwinist claims about what is, and is not, the
    result of natural selection.]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000313/sc/tech_threat_2.html Yahoo! ...
    March 13 .. New Technologies Imperil Humanity - U.S. Scientist SAN
    FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The co-founder of one of Silicon Valley's top technology
    companies believes scientific advances may be ushering humanity into a nightmare
    world where supersmart machines force mankind into extinction....Sun
    Microsystems Inc. .... chief scientist Bill Joy urges technologists to reconsider the
    ethics of the drive toward constant scientific innovation. "We are being propelled
    into this new century with no plan, no control, no brakes," Joy writes. "The last
    chance to assert control -- the fail-safe point -- is rapidly approaching." Joy's article
    comes as a rare cry of caution in an industry that thrives on relentless and often
    unplanned advances and is now riding the boom of a "new economy" expansion
    attributed to technological progress. The warning is all the more disturbing
    because of the author's own impressive tech credentials. A leading computer
    researcher who developed an early version of the Unix operating system, Joy has
    more recently pioneered software technologies like Java and was co-chairman of a
    presidential commission on the future of information technology. Joy's fears focus
    on three areas of technology undergoing incredibly rapid change. ... The first,
    robotics, involves the development of "thinking" computers ... setting the
    groundwork for a "robot species" of intelligent robots that create evolved copies
    of themselves. The second, genetics, deals with scientific breakthroughs in
    manipulating the very structure of biological life. While Joy says this has led to
    benefits such as pest-resistant crops, it also has set the stage for new, man-made
    plagues that could literally wipe out the natural world. The third, nanotechnology,
    involves the creation of objects on an atom-by-atom basis, which before long could
    be harnessed to create smart machines that are microscopically small. All three of
    these technologies share one characteristic absent in earlier dangerous human
    inventions such as the atomic bomb: they could replicate themselves, creating a
    cascade effect that could sweep through the physical word in much the same way a
    virus spreads through the computer world. "It is no exaggeration to say we are on
    the cusp of the further perfection of extreme evil," Joy writes. "An evil whose
    possibility spreads well beyond that which weapons of mass destruction
    bequeathed to nation states on to surprising and terrible empowerment of extreme
    individuals." ... [Bill Joy is one of the computer industry's great visionaries, and
    what he says should be taken seriously. Maybe, to paraphrase MIT's Joseph
    Weizenbaum (the creator of ELIZA), "not everything in science that can be done,
    *should* be done.]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000311/sc/environment_gorillas_2.html
    Yahoo! ... March 11 ... Poachers Decimate Gorilla Population in East Congo By
    Todd Pitman BUKAVU, Congo (Reuters) - Poaching has decimated the
    population of endangered gorillas in the war-ravaged east of the Democratic
    Republic of the Congo, officials said on Saturday. Only 70 eastern lowland gorillas
    remain in the highlands of Kahuzi-Biega National Park, just outside the lakeside
    border town of Bukavu, compared with a population of 258 several years ago.
    Most of the gorillas have been killed in the last year by poachers, militiamen and
    villagers in search of food.... Villagers living around the park have chopped down
    trees for charcoal and firewood and hunt animals, including antelope and
    chimpanzees, for "bushmeat." "People here have no money, but in the park they
    can find what they need," one park official said. "They can find bushmeat, gold,
    diamonds, ivory. It's become a business, and we can't control it." ... corruption and
    unfulfilled promises on the part of local rebel authorities have compounded the
    problem. ... [At least one of Darwin's predictions is coming true (see
    tagline).]

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/03/10/environment.mines.reut/ ... CNN ...
    Acid-eating bug may be to blame for mine pollution March 10, 2000 ...
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- A newly discovered microbe that eats iron and
    thrives in acid may be one of the main culprits causing pollution from metal ore
    mining, researchers said on Thursday. The microbe, dubbed Ferroplasma
    acidarmanus, seems to be able to make polluting sulfuric acid out of the sulfides
    found in metal ores ... It is a member of an ancient class of one-celled organisms
    called archaeons, ... The discovery may help explain why sulfur becomes part of
    nasty compounds so quickly around mines. It is also of interest to biologists
    because the microbe has no cell wall, defying the idea that microorganisms tough
    enough to live in harsh environments do it with the help of thick barriers. ... "It
    oxidizes irons and forms slimes and grows on pyrite sediments." ... Also at:
    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000309/sc/environment_mines_1.html
    [Sounds like an interesting `bug'. If this has been converting sulphides to sulphuric
    acid for billions of years, one wonders that there are any sulphides left. Maybe it is
    a fairly recent adaptation?]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000308/sc/science_brain_1.html ... Yahoo! ...
    March 8 ... Scientists Map Children's Brain Development LONDON (Reuters)
    Scientists said Wednesday they had successfully mapped the development of the
    brains of children between the ages of three and 15. ... the images provided new
    information about which areas of the brain were involved in learning at different
    ages. ... The scans of three and six-year-olds showed peak growth rates in frontal
    circuits of the brain that help to sustain a vigilant mental state and to plan new
    actions. The researchers also found that growth rates in an area of the brain linked
    to language were slow between the ages of three and six but speeded up from six
    to 15 years when fine tuning of language usually occurs. "The ability to learn new
    languages declines rapidly after the age of 12 years, as does the ability to recover
    language function if linguistic areas in one brain hemisphere are surgically
    resected," the scientists added. ... [More evidence of Chomsky's claim that the
    acquisition of language is a unique `hard-wired' feature of the human brain.]

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000308/sc/science_profiling_1.html ... Yahoo!
    ... March 8 ... UK Firm Applies for Patent on Gene Profile System By Patricia
    Reaney LONDON (Reuters) - A British company has applied for a patent for a
    gene-profiling system that can quickly reveal a person's genetic make-up and
    susceptibility to disease. Genostic Pharma, based in Cambridge and Edinburgh,
    claims the system could help doctors predict the course of an illness, the best drugs
    to treat it with the fewest side effects, and how a patient will respond. ... The
    system is based on a database of 2,500 genes, out of the 100,000 or more that
    make up the human genome, which the company believes are the key to
    understanding diseases. ... Genetic profiling is a controversial area of science.
    Advocates claim it will revolutionize medicine and improve the diagnosis and
    treatment of diseases. Critics fear it is a Pandora's box that will be used by
    insurance companies and employers to discriminate against people susceptible to
    certain diseases such as cancer. ... [One wonders how useful this genetic profiling
    would really be to employers? If firms reject an employee on the basis of his/her
    genetic profile, they would be sitting ducks for a discrimination claim. My guess is
    that employers would rather not know and simply work from a past history of
    illness (even that is discriminatory in Australia.]

    http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/features/2000/0308/fea4.htm The Irish Times
    ... March 8, 2000 The selfish meme ... Have scientists discovered the DNA of
    culture? Mic Moroney thinks not but it's a very catchy notion It started as a
    throwaway notion in 1976, has spread steadily like a cult, and now looks set now
    to virally implant itself, permanently, into the language. Enter the meme, a
    metaphoric spin-off from the genetic explosion: the fundamental self-replicating
    unit of culture, or even thought. ... the very idea of a meme has proved to be a
    successful bug, having spawned a growing academic field of "memetics" which its
    exponents, and impressionable journalists, now describe as a "science". ... Apart
    from precursor concepts such as "mnemones", the "meme" originally occurred to
    evolutionary theorist Richard Dawkins in the final pages of his influential
    bestseller, The Selfish Gene (1976). ... It's a catchy notion - the very idea of an
    idea, wrapped up in a neat word adapted from "gene" and linguistic terms such as
    "phoneme" (a perceptually distinct unit of sound). And in an increasingly
    freemarket world, it's but a short step to see a Darwinian struggle going on
    between chunks of information within a global habitat of human minds - what
    meme-heads call the "ideosphere". ... And just as mutually compatible genes
    ganged together symbiotically to form higher organisms, so memeticists argue,
    successful memes hooked up with other memes to form meme complexes, or
    "memeplexes": big selfcontained accretions of ideologies which may provide fringe
    benefits to human communities - or indeed damage ... Ultimately, such
    memeplexes exist only to ensure their own propagation. ... Memeticists tend to be
    hard-wired with neo-Darwinist memes ... As you go deeper and more gullibly into
    memetics, a whole ontological paradigm emerges in which ideas are seen as living
    organisms, which like viruses, "infect" and "parasitise" us, causing real physical
    changes in the wiring of our brains. ... Never mind that memes have no identifiable
    substrata or structure, or indeed that memes are not perfect replicators (people,
    say, tend to pass on the gist, rather than the literal text, of a story). Despite the
    dubious analogy with the gene, academia is buying memetics big-time. Memetics is
    now infiltrating cultural studies, media and communication theory, ethology
    (animal behaviour) and speculative fields such as evolutionary psychology, which
    worries about the origins of language, and indeed moral and altruistic behaviour. ...
    The wonderful circularity of memetics has seen it take over from semiotics as the
    central, delirious cul-de-sac of post-modern discourse. ... Just as we have always
    made anxious metaphors of ourselves and society from our dominant technologies,
    the meme meme, so to speak, ties in with the revival of social Darwinism in visions
    of capitalism; the infective metaphor of computer viruses; even the viral
    apocalypse of AIDS. ... Oxford University Press seems to have bought into it too.
    Among its recent "popular science" publications was The Meme Machine by Dr
    Susan Blackmore, a Zen practitioner and senior lecturer in Psychology at Bristol
    University ... To be horridly rational about it, memetics is all pseudo-scientific
    palaver, an analogy stretched too far, a metaphor gone badly to seed - but it's
    catchy and fun, and it's certainly not going to go away. Despite memetic
    fundamentalism, the "meme" word is a very elegant piece of intellectual shorthand;
    a rich lexicographical, and metaphorical tool - especially in an age in which, as
    never before, ideas often "take on a life of their own". ... [A good debunking of
    memes. Memes are a suicidal strategy for Darwinists, because Darwinism itself is a
    good candidate for a memeplexes: a "big self-contained accretion... of ideologies
    which exist only to ensure their own propagation"!]

    GENE THERAPY:
    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000315/sc/genetherapy_1.html
    Yahoo! ... Wednesday March 15 ...Congress to Continue Probe of Gene Therapy
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Congressional committee said on Tuesday it would
    continue a close examination of how the experimental field of gene therapy has been
    regulated, and warned the National Institutes of Health it might interrogate individual
    employees. ...

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000310/sc/health_genetherapy_5.html Yahoo!
    ... March 10 ... U.S. Experts Reject Halt to Gene Therapy By Maggie Fox, Health
    and Science Correspondent WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Scientists and other
    experts who advise the federal government on gene therapy issues rejected calls
    for a moratorium on experiments on Friday, but also warned researchers and
    patients against placing undue faith in the field. ... Experts in gene therapy say they
    have been unable to document any cure from the treatment -- which involves
    infusing new genes into the body to treat disease. .. "It is important for
    investigators and oversight bodies in gene transfer research to resist the temptation
    to exaggerate the potential for benefit and to overlook excessive risk out of the
    desire to help desperately ill patients, because at present the possibility of benefit
    from this novel technology is, on the whole, still too uncertain," ... Several patients
    taking part in gene therapy trials, or the parents of patients, pleaded with the RAC
    to press to keep experiments moving, saying that for many patients, gene therapy
    was the only hope. ...

    http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000309/sc/health_genetherapy_4.html Yahoo!
    ... March 9 ... Parents' Plea Illustrates Gene Therapy Dilemma By Maggie Fox,
    Health and Science Correspondent BETHESDA, Maryland (Reuters) - A
    desperate, emotional plea on Thursday from the parents of a brain-damaged
    daughter who say gene therapy is her only hope illustrated the dilemmas facing
    government advisers. Lindsay Karlin, now 5, suffers from a genetic disorder
    known as Canavan disease. She has been a patient in several experimental gene
    therapy trials and her parents, Dr. Roger Karlin and his wife, Helene, of New
    Fairfield, Connecticut, believe the experiments have helped her. ... To some
    scientists, the obvious answer is for researchers to report everything that goes
    wrong, immediately, so it can be discussed and decided whether the gene therapy
    is to blame. But private corporations, who sponsor many of the trials, fear that
    releasing such information would not only confuse people, but would give away
    valuable clues. "One phrase they used was that deaths of patients was a trade
    secret ... proprietary information," ...

    http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/03/07/gene.therapy/index.html ... New plans
    unveiled to protect gene therapy patients March 7, 2000 ... WASHINGTON
    (CNN) -- ...The FDA is implementing a Gene Therapy Clinical Trial Monitoring
    Plan and the NIH is sponsoring a series of Gene Transfer Symposia. Both
    initiatives are designed to enhance current safety standards for patients enrolled in
    gene therapy trials. The safety of patients in clinical trials involving gene therapy
    has been under scrutiny after one patient died during a gene therapy trial at the
    University of Pennsylvania last year. The FDA's plan will require that sponsors of
    gene therapy trials routinely submit their monitoring plans to the agency. ... Critics
    have said that there is not enough oversight in gene therapy trials and are skeptical
    that there are many more than the one known death which has been reported as a
    direct result of gene therapy. ...
    ==========================================================

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the
    civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the
    savage races throughout the world. At the same time the
    anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will
    no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies
    will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised
    state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a
    baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla."
    (Darwin C.R, "The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,"
    [1871], Modern Library, bound in one volume with, "The Origin of
    Species", Random House: New York NY, nd., p.521)
    Stephen E. Jones | sejones@iinet.net.au | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 20 2000 - 16:24:21 EST