Re: Marxism and Darwinism

From: MikeBGene@aol.com
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 09:22:52 EST

Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Obituaries William D. Hamilton; Biologist Helped to Advance Darwinism, etc"

Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Marxism and Darwinism"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Next in thread: Brian D Harper: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 3/17/00 12:03:29 AM Dateline Standard Time,
tich@primex.co.uk writes:

> I don't say that anyone who challenges any aspect of evolution is wrong. But
>I do say that the ID theories of Behe and Dembski are wrong, and that they
>have religious motives for pushing these theories. I wouldn't use the word
>"ulterior" as I think that implies deliberate deception.

What is "wrong" about them?

Mike

Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Obituaries William D. Hamilton; Biologist Helped to Advance Darwinism, etc"
Previous message: Richard Wein: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Maybe in reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Marxism and Darwinism"
Next in thread: Richard Wein: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Next in thread: Brian D Harper: "Re: Marxism and Darwinism"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 17 2000 - 09:23:31 EST