Re: Whose 'science'?

From: Cliff Lundberg (cliff@noe.com)
Date: Tue Feb 15 2000 - 04:30:17 EST

Next message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Stone Age man wasn't so dumb , etc"

Previous message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
In reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Whose 'science'?"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "Whose 'science'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>Bertvan
>Hi Cliff. Is the explanatory power of ID greater that that of naturalism,
>which also appears to claim the ability to explain everything?

Science doesn't explain everything, it just hopes to.

>Could materialism adjust to the possiblity that abiogenesis will never be
>explained?

Sure, if you could explain why this must be so.

>Or would they, like alchemists, continue their quest in spite of
>centuries of failure?

Sure, there's no time limit.

--Cliff Lundberg  ~  San Francisco  ~  cliff@noe.com

Next message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Stone Age man wasn't so dumb , etc"
Previous message: Cliff Lundberg: "Re: Whose 'science'?"
In reply to: Bertvan@aol.com: "Whose 'science'?"
Next in thread: Bertvan@aol.com: "Whose 'science'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 15 2000 - 05:14:39 EST