Stephen wrote:
>Of course Darwinists will no doubt argue that evolution must always have
>happened so rapidly in the past and/or in such small groups, that the fossil
>record didn't preserve the evidence of it.
Actually Gould and Eldridge were arguing this 20 years ago and it is now
widely accepted. Of course, they did not propose the thing without evidence
that it was the case. Most evolutionary biologists now believe their
evidence is compelling.
Susan
----------
For if there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing
of life as in hoping for another and in eluding the implacable grandeur of
this one.
--Albert Camus
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 03 2000 - 10:35:52 EST