Re: All forms of science designed for discussion

MikeBGene@aol.com
Tue, 23 Nov 1999 22:44:08 EST

In a message dated 11/23/99 1:38:16 PM Dateline Standard Time,
mortongr@flash.net writes:

> I have just discovered something. It appears that Jonathon Wells is a
>Moonie.

Gasp! I suppose this logically translates into a disproof of every
thing Wells says.

>As I have said many times, the ID movement really won't do Christianity any
>good as it can be applied to any religion including Islam.

I suppose this is meaningful for those only looking for things
that will "do Christianity any good." But let's not forget that we
could say the very same about Glenn: "Glenn's views really don't
do Christianity any good as they can be applied to any religion."

>See:

>http://www.harunyahya.org/Eng/homeeng.html

>I especially like the part that says:

>"The author has published numerous books and booklets explicitly proving
>the existence of Allah, emphasising the marvellous creation of Allah
>against the
>materialistic and atheistic ideologies, and of course their most efficient
>and significant view: the Evolution Theory"

>Sounds familiar doesn't it. He is the Phil Johnson of Turkey! Q.E.D.

Has Johnson written any books claiming to explicitly prove the
existence of God?

Besides, this guy simply shows that Susan doesn't know what
she is talking about when she asserts:

"Intelligent Design is formulated by Christians in order to defend Christian
mythology from reality. There's no other religion that I know of that
requires its mythology to be hard science."

Mike