<< While
science can never ultimately prove there is no plan and there never was a
plan, science can indicate whether a plan is necessary, and science has
determined that no plan is necessary. This is not my opinion; this is not
what I want to believe; this is not an unproven assumption; this is what
science concludes is true based on the evidence it has so far accumulated. >>
I think these claims all fail the "so what?" test. First, are we to really
believe that a plan can only exist if it is necessary? I don't think so.
Thus, that a plan is not necessary is hardly significant. Secondly,
even if a plan is somehow behind life, I do not think science is well-suited
for detecting it. Thus, these scientific conclusions relating to a plan are
not relevant.
Mike