Evolution - November 1999 by thread
Starting: Thu 04 Nov 1999 - 10:18:48 EST
Ending: Tue 30 Nov 1999 - 23:40:20 EST
Messages: 335
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) Tim Ikeda
- The Cambrian again? Susan B
- Complexity and Information Theory David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Susan Brassfield
- Re: [breakpoint] Darwin's Desperate Disciples, 11/22/1999 Huxter4441@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: World's Smallest Labs on Way to Mars, etc. Stephen E. Jones
- Design Theory vs Burden of Proof Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Cutting out text without ellipses (was Materialism) sejones@iinet.net.au
- Re: Design theory verses burden of proof. Cliff Lundberg
- Design theory verses burden of proof. Bertvan@aol.com
- Complexity and Information Theory Chris Cogan
- Complexity Chris Cogan
- Design theory vs. Burden of Proof Chris Cogan
- Copyright and the Reflector Terry M. Gray
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Copyright and the Reflector (was Why Lie?) Susan Brassfield
- Re: Cutting out text without ellipses (was Materialism) Stephen E. Jones
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion glenn morton
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) Tim Ikeda
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion glenn morton
- Are we machines? Chris Cogan
- Re: [breakpoint] Darwin's Desperate Disciples, 11/22/1999 Huxter4441@aol.com
- Re: Cutting out text without ellipses (was Materialism) sejones@iinet.net.au
- Re: Copyright and the Reflector (was Why Lie?) sejones@iinet.net.au
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Fwd: [breakpoint] Darwin's Desperate Disciples, 11/22/1999 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 2/2 (was Why lie?) Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Materialism glenn morton
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion glenn morton
- Re: Materialism glenn morton
- Materialism Bertvan@aol.com
- Why assume a lie? Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Materialism glenn morton
- materialism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Materialism - this is exactly what I meant.... Huxter4441@aol.com
- Materialism Bertvan@aol.com
- All forms of science designed for discussion Bertvan@aol.com
- Why assume a lie? Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion glenn morton
- Re: Why Lie? glenn morton
- Jello there Chris Cogan
- Fwd: Why assume a lie? Huxter4441@aol.com
- Why assume a lie? Bertvan@aol.com
- Materialism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 2/2 (was Why lie?) Huxter4441@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Susan B
- nailing jello Susan B
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 2/2 (was Why lie?) Susan B
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 1/2 (was Why lie?) Susan B
- Re: Move Over Mars -- Europa Needs Equal Billing Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Cognition of Recognition Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 2/2 (was Why lie?) Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Why assume a lie? - composite reply 1/2 (was Why lie?) Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Chris Cogan
- Re: Why assume it was a lie? (was Why lie?) Chris Cogan
- Re: Why assume it was a lie? (was Why lie?) Huxter4441@aol.com
- Materialism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Stephen E. Jones
- Gradualism and Phyletic Gradualism Wesley R. Elsberry
- Re: Why assume it was a lie? (was Why lie?) sejones@iinet.net.au
- Visual Recurrence Analysis, version 4.2 Kononov, Eugene
- Re: Why lie? Cliff Lundberg
- Why lie? Bertvan@aol.com
- All forms of science designed for discussion Bertvan@aol.com
- Why Lie? Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Why Lie mortongr@flash.net
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Why Lie Chris Cogan
- Re: All forms of science designed for discussion mortongr@flash.net
- Why lie? Susan B
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Origins of life; Sci-Am review Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Chris Cogan
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Interview with Sir John Polkinghorne on Christianity and Science Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- care to respond a bit more than the last sencence Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: care to respond to a bit more than the last sentence, Susan B
- Re: Looking for the gifts (where?) Tim Ikeda
- care to respond to a bit more than the last sentence, Bertv? Bertvan@aol.com
- care to respond to a bit more than the last sentence, Bertv? Huxter4441@aol.com
- Re: True things about evolution MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: True things about evolution MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: true things about evolution (part2) MikeBGene@aol.com
- Origins of Life; Sci-Am review Bertvan@aol.com
- Origins of life: Sci-Am review Bertvan@aol.com
- Meteorites, Dinosaurs, and Methane Wesley R. Elsberry
- [Fwd: Fiery End For Dinosaurs?] Gary Collins
- Origins of life: Sci-Am review Gary Collins
- Marx, Freud and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Freud, Marx and Darwin mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Heart patients fared better when strangers prayed Stephen E. Jones
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Peer reviewed Darwinism at its best Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #1 MikeBGene@aol.com
- Private messages and posting Wesley R. Elsberry
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #1 MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #1 MikeBGene@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #1 Susan B
- more of Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- More of Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- More of Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- More of Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- More of Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- Kevin's private posts Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory #1 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- psychiatric publications and cure rates Bertvan@aol.com
- Psychiatric publications and cure rates Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Invitation to subscribe to our free Christian Newsletter Kathleen Salinas
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Freud, Marx and Darwin Troy Britain
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Character assassination campaigns Wesley R. Elsberry
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- Freud, Marx and Darwin Bertvan@aol.com
- The origin of life Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Definition of Darwinism (3) Bertvan@aol.com
- Definition of Darwinism (2) Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: True things about evolution Chris Cogan
- Did we get our technology from Neanderthals? mortongr@flash.net
- Definition of Darwinism (1) Bertvan@aol.com
- definition of Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Feathered dinosaur flap Stephen E. Jones
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Science Struggles With Faith, Authority Stephen E. Jones
- The Implications of Emprical Theories Chris Cogan
- Re: Comparing Evolution to Design Theory Chris Cogan
- interesting sites Susan B
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Science Struggles With Faith, Authority Susan Brassfield
- RE: tetrapoidy in mammals Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: Science Struggles With Faith, Authority Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Robots Reclaim the Future Stephen E. Jones
- tetrapoidy in mammals R. Joel Duff
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 2/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists 1/2 Stephen E. Jones
- Re: chance is incompatible with God's creation? (was Complexity of life) Stephen E. Jones
- More on last neanderthal mortongr@flash.net
- Interesting thoughts from Pigliucci Arthur V. Chadwick
- non theisistic skepticism of common ancestry Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: chance is incompatible with God's creation? (was Complexity of MikeBGene@aol.com
- true things about evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- True things about evolutionary theory Wesley R. Elsberry
- Another Moody on evolution Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: chance is incompatible with God's creation? (was Complexity of Matthew Heaney
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: chance is incompatible with God's creation? (was Complexity of Matthew Heaney
- Ebola Lauds Kansas Decision (fwd) Marcio Pie
- The Impotent God of the Anti-evolutionists mortongr@flash.net
- Re: chance is incompatible with God's creation? (was Complexity of life) Stephen E. Jones
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Complexity of life Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Complexity of life mortongr@flash.net
- Re: Web Posting of Peppered Moth Review Paper Stephen E. Jones
- Earliest vertebrate Arthur V. Chadwick
Last message date: Tue 30 Nov 1999 - 23:40:20 EST
Archived on: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 23:40:27 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.