Mike:
>"I think you must not understand why *evidence* is important. I have a
>feeling you've bought the line of argumentation that says that evolution is
>*merely* a philosophy. It's not, any more than physics is."
>
>Bertvan is not talking about evolution here; he is talking about the
>mechanism behind evolution. Now, since evidence is so important,
>please pick your favorite example of a major change in organisms
>(Bertvan's words) and cite the *evidence* that random mutation and
>selection was indeed the mechanism behind this change.
I would be delighted to present evidence for "macro" and "micro" evolution
that involve mutation and natural selection.
I would also like you to join me in challenging Bertvan to bring forth the
evidence which compelled him to disbelieve in "random mutation and natural
selection."
Susan
----------
"Life itself is the proper binge."
--Julia Child
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/