>Lee Spetner's discussion of information obscures his real position-a form of
>neo Lamarckism.
How so? This assertion can hold no more for Spetner than is true for Cairns
and other well-known molecular biologists from whom Spetner derived his
data. He advocated nothing lamarckish that is not implicit in the data of
Cairns and others, that I could detect.
Art
http://geology.swau.edu