RE: Revised Kansas science standards

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:08:57 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: There used to be some powerful thinkers"
Previous message: mortongr@flash.net: "Re: Re-enlightenment!"

Bertvan: A legitimate opinion, but hardly scientific evidence. Until
someone explains exactly how new information is created
by natural selection, or how it arises accidentally and randomly,
so it can be "selected", no opinion should be imposed upon society
as "scientific truth" by the legal system. Can you say what YOU
mean by new genetic information?

ROTFL, this from the person who claims that it can NOT happen. I guess that was merely a personal opinion and not science? Perhaps you should make an effort to support your views?

Next message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: There used to be some powerful thinkers"
Previous message: mortongr@flash.net: "Re: Re-enlightenment!"