Pim:
>The naturalistic/materialistic 'foundation' argument is of course easily
>show erroneous.
Susan (again to Stephen):
>And why don't you ever answer my questions?
>
Pim:
>My guess ? Because he can't. Indeed his arguments have shown themselves to
>be unsupportable in fact, and are often based upon a careless reading on
>his part.
It *is* amusing how he even misreads Johnson. But your are correct. He
ignores my questions because he can't answer them. :-)
Susan
----------
"Life itself is the proper binge."
--Julia Child
http://www.telepath.com/susanb/