thank you! very compelling evidence that all flowers (gymnosperms(sp?))
descended from a common ancestor and share a family resemblence :-)
>As David Berlinski said regarding the astonishing discovery that all
>eyes are produced by the one master gene, "No one in possession of
>these facts can imagine that they support the Darwinian theory":
when the data seem to point to the fact that all life is closely related?
How does that violate Darwin's theory? His theory hangs on common descent.
Well observed Susan, that is exactly what came to mind when I read SJ's confused commentary.