RE: TE/EC marginalised? #4

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Thu, 29 Jul 1999 08:41:57 -0700

JC>While the ID movement has some good ideas I suspect that they
>looking for design at the wrong level. So far they have come up with
>little more than Paley.

SJ : So what does Jonathan think Dembski's "explanatory filter" ground-
breaking arguments in "The Design Inference", that were even published
by Cambridge University Press, are - chopped liver?

Nope, they merely serve to show that natural selection is a good example of ID. See for instance Wesley Ellsberry's review in NCSE Reports, march/april 1999.

So much for ID...