Evolution - June 1999 by thread
Starting: Tue 01 Jun 1999 - 01:30:15 EDT
Ending: Wed 30 Jun 1999 - 22:07:38 EDT
Messages: 379
- Morris on ID Joel Duff
- Re: What a star! Stephen Jones
- FYI Steve Clark
- Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Steve Clark
- Re: ID: 'episodic creationist' and 'based on the artisan metaphor'? Stephen Jones
- RE: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Stephen Jones
- Re: Definition of `design', `intelligent design' (was Definitions needed) Stephen Jones
- Cambrian Explosion Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: "scientific" position on philosophical questions Jason Bode
- Strange hybrids MccarrickAD@nswccd.navy.mil
- Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Susan Brassfield
- Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Steve Clark
- Re: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Susan Brassfield
- "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Susan Brassfield
- More data on the Neanderthal hybrid Glenn R. Morton
- Neanderthal hybrid Glenn R. Morton
- "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on Susan B
- Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Susan B
- Re: biology has belatedly realised that it is, itself, an information technology Stephen Jones
- Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid 2/2 Stephen Jones
- Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid 1/2 Stephen Jones
- Re: ID: 'episodic creationist' and 'based on the artisan Howard J. Van Till
- evolution-digest V1 #1511 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1510 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1509 evolution-digest
- RE: "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Pim van Meurs
- "Scientific" position on philosophical questions Bertvan@aol.com
- evolution-digest V1 #1508 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1507 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1506 evolution-digest
- RE: science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Pim van Meurs
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Pim van Meurs
- Re: ID: `episodic creationist' and `based on the artisan metaphor'? (was ID MN - limitation...) Stephen Jones
- evolution-digest V1 #1505 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1504 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1503 evolution-digest
- science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: RE:_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the_natural_world Chris Cogan
- Message not deliverable administrator_at_ucomp@ccmail.llu.edu
- evolution-digest V1 #1502 evolution-digest
- evolution-digest V1 #1501 evolution-digest
- RE: It all fits... Pim van Meurs
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Pim van Meurs
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_=5Fscience=5Fcan=5Fstudy=5Fthe=5Feffect=5F?= Pim van Meurs
- Fwd: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Glenn Morton
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Re: It all fits... Stephen Jones
- Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Stephen Jones
- sorry Jason Bode
- Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Chris Cogan
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural Jason Bode
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural Jason Bode
- RE:_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intelligent_Designer_on_the natural_world Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science David J. Tyler
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE=3A_science_can_study_the_effect_of_an_Intell?= Pim van Meurs
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Howard J. Van Till
- RE: Are apologists irreducibly dense? David J. Tyler
- RE: Immitation of science of immitation of reality Pim van Meurs
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Pim van Meurs
- RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Pim van Meurs
- RE: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Pim van Meurs
- Immitation of science of immitation of reality Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Jason Bode
- Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Stephen Jones
- Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan Brassfield
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Susan Brassfield
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Jason Bode
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Pim van Meurs
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science David J. Tyler
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Pim van Meurs
- RE: Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Pim van Meurs
- RE: Design as a Research Program (was clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists...) Pim van Meurs
- RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Pim van Meurs
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science David J. Tyler
- The need for distinguishing tests, etc. Chris Cogan
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan B
- RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Pim van Meurs
- Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Glenn Morton
- Finely Tuned Razors, Bridges, and Flies [was Re: Snicker Brian D Harper
- Re: Design as a Research Program (was clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists...) Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Re: More balance on claimed Neandertal-Modern Human hybrid Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Susan Brassfield
- RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Pim van Meurs
- RE: Two Complementary faces of establishment science Pim van Meurs
- RE: [breakpoint] The Puzzle of Life, 6/16/99 Pim van Meurs
- RE: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Pim van Meurs
- RE: Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Pim van Meurs
- Dead Ends vs. Open Ends Chris Cogan
- The conditions for life, etc. Chris Cogan
- Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on Susan B
- Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Susan B
- RE: Are apologists irreducibly dense? Glenn Morton
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan B
- Fwd: [breakpoint] The Puzzle of Life, 6/16/99 Stephen Jones
- Re: science can study the effect of an Intelligent Designer on the natural world (was MN...)) Stephen Jones
- Re: Having one's designer and eating him too (yummy!) Susan Brassfield
- Two Complementary faces of establishment science David J. Tyler
- Having one's designer and eating him too (yummy!) Chris Cogan
- Snicker Snack, went the Vorpal Razor Chris Cogan
- Re: Academic thought police Susan Brassfield
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? David J. Tyler
- Re: cutting throats ;) {was: getting a shave} with Occam's Razor Jason Bode
- RE: That razor again. Pim van Meurs
- Re: Academic thought police Steve Clark
- That razor again. Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Susan Brassfield
- Re: Academic thought police Susan Brassfield
- Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Huxter4441@aol.com
- Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Huxter4441@aol.com
- Getting a shave with Occam's Razor Chris Cogan
- Re: Piano tipping Chris Cogan
- That Razor again. Chris Cogan
- Re: Occam's Razor Cuts Deeply Jason Bode
- Re: Piano tipping Jason Bode
- Occam's Razor Cuts Deeply, and rejecting science Chris Cogan
- Types of ID theory, testing, putting mind where mouth is, etc. Chris Cogan
- Definitions needed Howard J. Van Till
- RE: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Pim van Meurs
- RE: the clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists put aside the design argument Pim van Meurs
- RE: the clearest presentation of the reasons that scientists put aside the design argument Stephen Jones
- Re: Darwinists contradictions re new genetic information Stephen Jones
- "Materialism" - was RE: Academic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Pim van Meurs
- CRSQ engages in historical revisionism Glenn R. Morton
- "Materialism" - was RE: Academic thought police Tim Ikeda
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was Brian D Harper
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Pim van Meurs
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Pim van Meurs
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Pim van Meurs
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Pim van Meurs
- RE: Academic thought police Pim van Meurs
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Re: I'm back! Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Bertvan@aol.com
- Academic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Pim van Meurs
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Pim van Meurs
- RE: Academic thought police Pim van Meurs
- Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Bertvan@aol.com
- Academic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Academic thought police Pim van Meurs
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Chris Cogan
- Re: Fish to Amphibian Glenn R. Morton
- Re: Fish to Amphibian Glenn R. Morton
- Academic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- Academic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Acadmic thought police Susan Brassfield
- Acadmic thought police Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Pim van Meurs
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Pim van Meurs
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Pim van Meurs
- Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Bertvan@aol.com
- Academic thought police (was Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense?) Jonathan Clarke
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Stephen Jones
- Re: Fossil of oldest beaked bird discovered Stephen Jones
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly densie? Glenn R. Morton
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Brian D Harper
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Glenn R. Morton
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? David J. Tyler
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Pim van Meurs
- Re: Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Susan Brassfield
- Re: Moses and Biblical contradictions? Jason Bode
- RE: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Pim van Meurs
- RE: Cause and effect in evolution Pim van Meurs
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? David J. Tyler
- RE: The Case for Intelligent Design Pim van Meurs
- JOBOP Res Assoc Mammalian Cells 915603@candseek.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Chris Cogan
- RE: Neo Darwinism Pim van Meurs
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan B
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tim Ikeda
- Re: Cause and effect in evolution Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan Brassfield
- Re: On Believing Things Because they are Printed in Books Susan Brassfield
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Brian D Harper
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? David J. Tyler
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Neo Darwinism Cliff Lundberg
- Choice and design and Occam's razor, etc. Chris Cogan
- On Believing Things Because they are Printed in Books Chris Cogan
- RE: Neo Darwinism Pim van Meurs
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Jason Bode
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Susan B
- Precisely what is "Natural Selection"? Mark Phillips
- Re: Divine Feet Susan B
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Divine Feet are not only in the door, they're in the woods, too. Chris Cogan
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Neo Darwinism Cliff Lundberg
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Computer Scientist To Explore Intricacies Of Biological Evolution Gary Collins
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Chris Cogan
- Re: The Case for Intelligent Design Stephen Jones
- Re: I'm back! Stephen Jones
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Stephen Jones
- RE: Neo Darwinism Pim van Meurs
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Neo Darwinism Pim van Meurs
- Laws of nature Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? Chris Cogan
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Stephen Jones
- Laws of nature Bertvan@aol.com
- Laws of nature Chris Cogan
- RE: Evolution archive list Pim van Meurs
- Evolution archive list Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Chris Cogan
- Re: Geometry as Physics, foundations of mathematics Chris Cogan
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: I'm back! Brian D Harper
- Re: I'm back! Stephen Jones
- Re: Mice Study Shows Genes Are Not Always Destiny Stephen Jones
- Re: Neo Darwinism Susan Brassfield
- Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Susan Brassfield
- Re: Evolution archive list Susan Brassfield
- Re: Geometry as Physics, foundations of mathematics Jason Bode
- Neo Darwinism Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: MN - limitation of science or limitation on reality? (was evolution archive list) Stephen Jones
- Evolution archive list Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: I'm back! Brian D Harper
- evolution archive list Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: I'm back! Stephen Jones
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Are developmental biologists irreducibly dense? Tim Ikeda
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Pim van Meurs
- Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Chris Cogan
- Re: Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Jason Bode
- A Note on Validation as a Broader Concept than that of Proof. Chris Cogan
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- progress in evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- Evfolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Bertvan@aol.com
- Design vs. Occam's Razor, Geometry as Physics, and the foundations of mathematics Chris Cogan
- Evolution generalized, and two points about philosophy Chris Cogan
- The "direction" of evolution, etc. Chris Cogan
- Progress in evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- evolution archive list Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Susan Brassfield
- Humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- progress in evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: humans irreducibly complex? David J. Tyler
- RE: Are humans irreducibly complex? Pim van Meurs
- RE: progress in evolution Pim van Meurs
- progress in evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- Are humans irreducibly complex Bertvan@aol.com
- RE: progress in evolution Pim van Meurs
- Re: progress in evolution Rich Daniel
- progress in evolution Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Susan Brassfield
- Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Susan Brassfield
- Re: age of the earth Rich Daniel
- progress in evolution Rich Daniel
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- Evolvability Tim Ikeda
- Re: humans irreducibly complex? Tim Ikeda
- Re: More Proteinoid Information Biochmborg@aol.com
- Re: Are humans irreducibly complex? Susan Brassfield
- Are humans irreducibly complex? Bertvan@aol.com
- Re: Origin of the Phyla David J. Tyler
- Re: Origin of the Phyla Loren Haarsma
- Re: humans irreducibly complex? Tom Pearson
- Re: humans irreducibly complex? David J. Tyler
- Re: Origin of the Phyla David J. Tyler
- Re: tolerance Susan B
- Re: Behe/Newton, bombardier beetle Susan B
- Re: More Proteinoid Information Arthur V. Chadwick
- Re: General Response Steve Clark
- Re: Tolerance Jason Bode
- Re: More Proteinoid Information Biochmborg@aol.com
- Re: Tolerance Susan Brassfield
- Re: humans irreducibly complex? David J. Tyler
- Re: General Response Biochmborg@aol.com
Last message date: Wed 30 Jun 1999 - 22:07:38 EDT
Archived on: Wed Jun 30 1999 - 22:07:42 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 1.02.