> Am I the only one wondering how we know the _spleen_ of a 25,000 old
> skeleton is modern?
I interpreted the part about the spleen, as reporter stupidity. Spleens
are not part of the skeleton and can't be part of the skeletal material.
In fact, I have never heard a discussion of the spleen from any anthro
text or article.
-- glennFoundation, Fall and FloodAdam, Apes and Anthropologyhttp://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm