Re: Flood Model and dinosaur tracks
Karen G. Jensen (kjensen@calweb.com)
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:31:38 -0600>Kevin O'Brien wrote:
>
>> You ignored the most serious error of all.
>
>Actually, one of the most serious problems for flood geology has yet to be
>brought up - nesting sites. There are spots in Montana, Argentina, China and
>many other places that have large dinosaur nesting sites, inclusing multiple
>nesting sites in different strata. So we are to imagine, somehow, that in the
>midst of this global flood, after the deposition of thousands of feet of
>sediments already, large groups of dinosaurs managed to congregate and mate,
>build nests, lay eggs, hatch them and raise them, then return there
>several more
>times to complete the process all over again. Obviously this cannot be
>explained
>by saying that all of the land had not yet been scoured clean, because the
>sites
>lie on top of sediments that were supposedly laid down from the PC/C
>boundary to
>the jurassic and triasic. It also cannot be explained by any hydrological
>sorting hypothesis like size and differential mobility. It simply cannot be
>explained using flood geology.
>
Unless you recognize that pregnant female dinosaurs would have to drop
their eggs at some time during a stressful year, that the nest sites were
water-laid, indicating inundation of the areas, and that the multiple
layers show repeated inundations.
Karen