(no subject)

Pim van Meurs (entheta@eskimo.com)
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 09:11:27 -0700

At 08:38 PM 10/12/98 -0700, Joseph wrote:
>The challenge is plain.
>Apparently, no evolutionist can answer it.
>That is all I needed to know.
>Joseph Mastropaolo

Steven : Joseph assumes that the failure to respond to his challenge is because he
has provided an airtight critique of evolution using probability. However,
there can be more than one reason that a challenge is not taken up. In
this case, the challenge has been shown to be built on false use of
probability and is therefore nonsense."

It was predictable that Joseph was distracting from the real issues with silly and unrelated bets.
That's Joseph's interpretation of "following the scientific method' ?