I just finished reading the Hugh Ross' "Creation and Time", and something
caught my
attention. When dealing with the evidence coming from the cosmological data
(his area of expertise), he uses a very critical approach, trying to
conciliate the different views and taking into account both the biblical
and the scientific evidence. On the other hand, when dealing with evidence
coming from evolutionary data (presumably not his area of expertise), he
changes his approach and analyzes evolution just like the YECs do (omitting
and misinterpreting). Honestly, I cannot understand how he manages to do
that.
Marcio
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Marcio R. Pie
Departamento de Zoologia
UNICAMP
Campinas - SP Brazil