Still repeating the same old refuted nonsense ? Btw you still are confused about the probability of a perpetual motion machine, which is exactly zero and gold being not being an alloy. How often do scientists have to correct your nonsense ?
Joseph: <<
Scientists base belief on probability of 0.95 or higher. The
evolutionist pretends to believe the impossible, which out of politesse
may be called miracles. >>
More nonsense on Joseph's part. The 0.95 refers to statistical signicance, not probability. Poor Joseph is showing more ignorance.
Joseph: << Evolutionists pretend that adaptation, an attribute of all flora and
fauna, is evolution. A bacterium adapts to its environment, a leaf turns
toward the sun, an arctic hare changes its fur from gray in summer to
snow white in winter, the color of moth wings and the beaks of finches
are adaptations misrepresented as evolution.>>
No they are accurately described by evolution.
Joseph: <<
The probability of abiogenesis, spontaneous generation and "evolution"
is less than 2.3x10^-75 because from the beginning of recorded history
through the present moment it has never been observed and is therefore
something other than science.>>
More nonsense from our pseudo scientist.
It is obvious that Joseph is the opposite of a scientist.