>Let's review the nature of Dawkin's answer on the
>transcript. First he provides a more precise definition
>of what information means in terms of complexity. Not
>as precise as we might like but perfectly acceptable for
>the situation....
This is amazing! With friends like you around to cover his blunders,
Dawkins should have no fear from the misguided efforts of creationists to
uncover his weaknesses! Come on, Brian, let him speak for himself (which,
in this case, he has already done, to his further embarrassment.)
Art
http://biology.swau.edu