That is true; if the argument is what is important here, don't read the
book. I thought this was about exchanging information that might be
important to issues of origins. I would like to see some dialog on what
Spetner has said. But until someone reads the book, all we can do is argue
about semantics. Well, so be it. But when some of you have analyzed what
he has said, we can discuss the information and his interpretations, and
incidentally, whether we agree or disagree with his use of information or
other terms.
Art
http://biology.swau.edu