I for one at least will get and read his book; I plan to try to order it
from Barnes & Noble this weekend.
The situation though is that you claim that our "definitions" of
information are not correct based on Spetner's claims, but for now you are
the only one who knows what those claims are. Yet you are reluctant to
explain those claims that support your position. If you feel we are wrong,
it is only proper that you explain why, so that we can understand your
reasoning.
Please Art?
Kevin L. O'Brien
klob@lamar.colostate.edu