When I read Denton's first book, it seemed quite obvious to me from his
chapters on morphology and molecular biology that he rejected the concept
of common descent. I have not yet read his new book, but those who have
claim that Denton now states that that position was wrong, that common
descent is real. If this is true, this represents a radical departure from
his original position rather than a smooth transition.
Kevin L. O'Brien
"Good God, consider yourselves fortunate that you have John Adams to abuse,
for no sane man would tolerate it!" William Daniels, _1776_