So why are you such a fan of Philip Johnson and Michael Behe who are
reviving Paley's argument from design?
>
>5. 1990-2000. With the conversion and call of Phillip Johnson, a Senior
>Professor of Law at Berkeley University (and a man of genius intellect),
>creation has entered a new phase. Johnson through his brilliant critical
>analysis of Darwinism and his refusal to follow the TE strategy of attacking
>YECs, has quickly seized the Creationist middle ground (eg. Progressive
>Creationists/OECs-Moderate YECs) and has welded it into the Intelligent
>Design (ID) movement. Rightly sensing that Johnson is a threat to their
>respective positions, first leading TEs and lately some leading YECs have
>attacked Johnson. Johnson has not retaliated against the YECs (and indeed
>has very cordial relations with many YECs), but he has vigorously
>defended himself against the leading TEs, whom he has rightly pointed out
>are really Theistic Naturalists.
But Philip is reviving Paley's argument from design that you said was bad
above.
glenn
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Foundation, Fall and Flood
& lots of creation/evolution information
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm